Pamela backs the Chickens
July 10th 2008 00:29
Well after last nights surprise entry to the Australian Big Brother House Pamela Anderson has caused quite a stir confirming she would be protesting against major sponsor KFC, she claims the chickens used by KFC Asutralia are killed in a cruel manner, the following has been taken from news.com.au
Now if the shows major sponsor is KFC who does she think would foot some of the costs for her visit?
So does the question then become; which came first the Chicken or the dollars?
Less than five hours after arriving in Australia yesterday, the 41-year-old ambassador for animal welfare group PETA announced that tomorrow she would deliver a letter protesting KFC's treatment of chickens to a Gold Coast KFC outlet.
The letter and accompanying video - addressed to Albert Baladi, the managing director of KFC's Australian parent company - claims the fast food chain's suppliers scald chickens to death in defeathering tanks.
The serial Playboy bunny admitted she had agreed to appear on Ten's reality TV show because she was being paid "a lot".
"Much more than I'm worth. I had to come. I can't believe it," she said. Asked if her pay cheque of was in excess of $500,000, she replied: "I don't want to say how much, but it was a lot."
The letter and accompanying video - addressed to Albert Baladi, the managing director of KFC's Australian parent company - claims the fast food chain's suppliers scald chickens to death in defeathering tanks.
The serial Playboy bunny admitted she had agreed to appear on Ten's reality TV show because she was being paid "a lot".
"Much more than I'm worth. I had to come. I can't believe it," she said. Asked if her pay cheque of was in excess of $500,000, she replied: "I don't want to say how much, but it was a lot."
Now if the shows major sponsor is KFC who does she think would foot some of the costs for her visit?
So does the question then become; which came first the Chicken or the dollars?
| 68 |
| Vote |
